Dichotomy

The world assembly of civil society organisations, CIVICUS, got underway in Glasgow yesterday. However no Islamic non-government organisations are attending, as reported by IPS. This “invisible dividing line” has been picked up by attendees from a number of Muslim countries.

“The Islamic groups are also civil society, though the groups are not registered, and they are influential groups, they can get a lot of other groups to follow them.”
-Sarra Osman Eisa from a Sudanese NGO

Whether Islamic NGOs are being sidelined because of ideological reasons or because of a horrible accident of self-defeating political correctness, the end result is that CIVICUS has excluded organisations that represent people. Forgive me, but aren’t orgs that represent people who this assembly is for?

Naved Choudhury, an NGO worker from Bangladesh points out:

“A lot of schools in Bangladesh, the madrassas, run by religious groups reach out to millions. A few of them have been found to have had links with terrorist groups. But the development work they are doing cannot be ignored, they need to be brought into the mainstream of the development discourse.”

I think CIVICUS decision to distance itself from Islamic civil-society groups is short-sighted. It is because of assemblies like theirs that religious groups can be brought out into discourse with secular donor-funded groups. At the same time, these Islamic NGOs are able to reach out to huge numbers of people. They would be most valuable when it comes to implement the much-needed and universally accepted calls for madrasa reforms.

The dichotomy is that in Muslim countries, Islamic political groups now head up much sought voting blocks, as shown in these pornographic foreplay shots between secular and religious politicians. Whereas, civil society groups that quietly work away at the grass-roots not only get used by those politicians that puportedly represent them, but they are also, as shown in Glasgow this week, ignored by donors and their peers from other NGOs. What a shame.

4 Responses to “Dichotomy”

  1. Fug Says:

    the waqf and mosque social infrastructure is far more entrenched and real that this civil society pap.

    individuals who want to help, should dignify them by participating along with them, rather than using them to score development/feel good points.

    that way , real communities will advance, not the NGO industry

  2. Sid H Arthur Says:

    You might be in danger of closing your eyes to the wealth of work that Islamic NGOs provide at grassroot. I think we’re talking cross-purposes. I’m talking about NGO activity that handle literacy, primary health and provision of small scale medical services and orphanages programs direct to the abject poor in the Third World. How do you question that that isn’t necessarily waqf and mosque-based?

  3. mIRC Says:

    Writing comments is a very good deal, but only in case when you understand the topic completely

  4. ieatatsonic Says:

    Great post, just like always. When I’m entering your blog I’m always sure I won’t regret it. Continue writing.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Under the golmal, the serious golmal